While the Telecommunications Act, 2023 (“Telecom Act”) has been notified on 24th December 2024, it will come into force in a phased manner. The Ministry of Communications, vide gazette notifications dated 26th June 2024 and 4th July 2024, has brought into effect certain sections of the Telecom Act. Many provisions of the Telecom Act will be operationalized through rules. On 29th August 2024, the Department of Telecommunication (“DoT”) under the Ministry of Communication published drafts of the following four rules for public consultation till 27th September 2024 under the Telecom Act:
The draft rules suffer from the same shortcomings that the extant regime on interception is subject to, in so far as, the lack of appropriate safeguards for protecting the privacy of individuals (despite the right to privacy being recognized as a fundamental right) and the lack of meaningful and independent judicial or parliamentary oversight. Also given the wide definitions of terms in the Telecom Act describing and defining relevant and applicable stakeholders, at this stage it is unclear whether OTT communication services will be covered within the purview of the interception orders or not.
The Draft Rules also require all mobile devices to have their identification numbers (IMEI) registered with the Government, and in case of any tampering with the IMEI or device, the devices will be blocked by the Government from accessing networks.
The Chief Telecom Security Officer has been made responsible for the implementation of these draft rules.
While the effort of the DoT to undertake public consultation on the draft rules is laudatory, there are several aspects that require further and careful deliberations. For instance, there is a need to institute a specific provision in the Telecom Act itself which requires the Government/regulator to undertake a public consultation process before notification of any regulations/rules. Furthermore, such regulations/rules should have a sunset clause or a requirement to review the same every 5-10 years.
Another aspect that requires clarification is with respect to the applicability of the Telecom Act and rules thereunder to OTT communication services. The definitions of terms like ‘telecommunication services’ and ‘telecommunication entity’ under the Telecom Act and draft rules are wide enough to include OTT Communication Services like WhatsApp, iMessage, etc. within its ambit. This has understandably caused a lot of regulatory uncertainty about the applicability of the Act to such services. In case the Telecom Act and the Draft Rules are made applicable to OTT Communication Services, then the authorities could, among other things, order the interception of messages exchanged over such services which offer end-to-end encryption. Accordingly, the DoT should issue a formal clarification regarding the applicability of the Telecom Act and the rules made thereunder to OTT communication services.
The Draft Rules lack substantive safeguards against executive overreach as they mandate a review of orders issued for interception, and suspension of telecom services by authorities to a review committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary/Chief Secretary, therefore retaining executive control. The Srikrishna Committee Report in 2018 noted that the Review Committee has an unrealistic task of reviewing 15000-18000 interception orders in every review meeting held once in 2 months, which calls into question their ability to properly scrutinize these orders. The report also highlighted the need for parliamentary or judicial approval/oversight of such orders and noted that executive review alone is not in tandem with comparative models in democratic nations which either provide for legislative oversight (Germany), judicial approval (UK) or both (South Africa).
This article was first published on Saikrishna & Associates